Shrinked-Space Search Method for LVCTs' Parameters Identification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart thermostats have become a promising device to control electric baseboard heaters' energy consumption while considering their flexibility in the demand response (DR) context. This article applies a shrinked-space search method to identify the tuning parameters of line voltage communicating thermostats (LVCTs). The proposed approach based on Bayesian optimization (BO) algorithm takes account of a reference model to drastically shrink the search space while enforcing the identification of a single set of parameters compatible with all arising dynamics of the controller and helping to establish an interpretable model. Furthermore, a subsequent integral tracking strategy has been adopted to convexify the objective function (for identification purposes) while considering the logical constraints governing the thermostat dynamics. This helps to recover the updating logic of the integral part of the controller model. The experimental validation results of eight LVCTs operating in an inhabited house show the effectiveness of the proposed method since it leads to establishing digital twins for the studied controllers. In addition, a case study is presented to demonstrate the usefulness of the reconstructed model in a DR framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it