MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391548184 · doi:10.31390/opmns.093

Diving at High Altitude: O2 Transport and Utilization in the Ruddy Duck and Torrent Duck in the Andes

2024· article· en· W4391548184 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin G. McCracken, Graham R. Scott, Luis Alza, Andrea A. Astié, Ciska Bakkeren, Emil Bautista, Mariana Bulgarella, Rebecca Cheek Cheek, Beverly Chua, Neal J. Dawson, Alexis Díaz, Catherine M. Ivy, Peter B. Frappell, Cecilia Kopuchian, Sabine Lagu�, John N. Maina, Violeta Mu�oz-Fuentes, Elizabeth Schell, Matthew M. Smith, Ryan J. Sprenger, Pablo L. Tubaro, Thomas Valqui, Roy E. Weber, Daniela Wilner, Robert E. Wilson, Julia M. York, William K. Milsom

Bibliographic record

VenueOccasional papers of the Museum of Natural Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaMcMaster University
FundersUniversity of Johannesburg
KeywordsEffects of high altitude on humansAltitude (triangle)Hypoxia (environmental)BiologyPhysiological AdaptationsEcologyPhenotypic plasticityLow altitudeZoologyOxygenChemistryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypoxia and cold temperatures create unique physiological challenges for high-altitude organisms that can vary depending on lifestyle. While nearly all studies of air-breathing animals at high altitude are from terrestrial species, species that breath-hold dive underwater at high altitude encounter a very different set of selective pressures influencing their phenotype. The goal of this publication is to highlight the changes in O2 transport and utilization in high-altitude diving birds relative to divers at sea level, and the extent to which these changes are qualitatively distinct from phenotypic changes in non-diving species at high altitude. For example, while high capacities for sustained O2 transport may be required for sustained flight and thermogenesis (particularly in small endotherms), high-altitude breath-hold diving is a form of intense exercise uniquely defined by transient and sometimes severe O2 depletion (hypoxemia) and CO2 accumulation (hypercapnia), interspersed by recovery between dives when O2 stores must be rapidly replenished despite the hypoxic environment at high altitude. Given this, diving behavior may preclude or constrain the physiology of divers, such that high-altitude divers are predicted to exhibit qualitatively distinct phenotypic changes compared to non-divers, as each likely experience unique signals for phenotypic plasticity and selective pressures driving their evolution. Here, we reanalyze and synthesize new and recent findings describing O2 transport for two high-altitude breath-hold divers in the Andes of South America, the ruddy duck (Oxyura jamaicensis) and the torrent duck (Merganetta armata). Analysis across the O2-transport cascade including (1) ventilation, (2) pulmonary O2 diffusion, (3) circulatory O2 delivery, (4) tissue O2 diffusion, and (5) tissue O2 utilization reveals that different routes to functional adaptation have emerged between diving and non-diving birds in the high Andes. While ruddy ducks and torrent ducks differed in numerous ways, we found that these two high-altitude divers had generally much higher blood-O2 carrying capacity relative to non-divers. Furthermore, unlike non-diving high-altitude waterfowl, these highaltitude divers did not increase Hb-O2 affinity at high altitude, because Hb-O2 affinity was already high in the low-altitude diving ancestor. Due to these factors, these divers always had higher arterial O2 content (CaO2) than non-divers, but unlike the non-divers, there was never any difference in CaO2 between high- and low-altitude populations among the divers. Finally, high-altitude divers exhibited greater magnitudes of body temperature (Tb) suppression during hypoxia than their corresponding low-altitude populations, whereas hypoxic Tb suppression was similar between high- and lowaltitude taxa among non-divers. In fact, the ruddy duck

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccasional papers of the Museum of Natural ScienceSame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207