Diving at High Altitude: O2 Transport and Utilization in the Ruddy Duck and Torrent Duck in the Andes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypoxia and cold temperatures create unique physiological challenges for high-altitude organisms that can vary depending on lifestyle. While nearly all studies of air-breathing animals at high altitude are from terrestrial species, species that breath-hold dive underwater at high altitude encounter a very different set of selective pressures influencing their phenotype. The goal of this publication is to highlight the changes in O2 transport and utilization in high-altitude diving birds relative to divers at sea level, and the extent to which these changes are qualitatively distinct from phenotypic changes in non-diving species at high altitude. For example, while high capacities for sustained O2 transport may be required for sustained flight and thermogenesis (particularly in small endotherms), high-altitude breath-hold diving is a form of intense exercise uniquely defined by transient and sometimes severe O2 depletion (hypoxemia) and CO2 accumulation (hypercapnia), interspersed by recovery between dives when O2 stores must be rapidly replenished despite the hypoxic environment at high altitude. Given this, diving behavior may preclude or constrain the physiology of divers, such that high-altitude divers are predicted to exhibit qualitatively distinct phenotypic changes compared to non-divers, as each likely experience unique signals for phenotypic plasticity and selective pressures driving their evolution. Here, we reanalyze and synthesize new and recent findings describing O2 transport for two high-altitude breath-hold divers in the Andes of South America, the ruddy duck (Oxyura jamaicensis) and the torrent duck (Merganetta armata). Analysis across the O2-transport cascade including (1) ventilation, (2) pulmonary O2 diffusion, (3) circulatory O2 delivery, (4) tissue O2 diffusion, and (5) tissue O2 utilization reveals that different routes to functional adaptation have emerged between diving and non-diving birds in the high Andes. While ruddy ducks and torrent ducks differed in numerous ways, we found that these two high-altitude divers had generally much higher blood-O2 carrying capacity relative to non-divers. Furthermore, unlike non-diving high-altitude waterfowl, these highaltitude divers did not increase Hb-O2 affinity at high altitude, because Hb-O2 affinity was already high in the low-altitude diving ancestor. Due to these factors, these divers always had higher arterial O2 content (CaO2) than non-divers, but unlike the non-divers, there was never any difference in CaO2 between high- and low-altitude populations among the divers. Finally, high-altitude divers exhibited greater magnitudes of body temperature (Tb) suppression during hypoxia than their corresponding low-altitude populations, whereas hypoxic Tb suppression was similar between high- and lowaltitude taxa among non-divers. In fact, the ruddy duck
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".