Corps sensibles, corps contraints, corps émancipés : les adolescents face au cinéma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans un univers dominé par les industries culturelles et médiatiques et face à un contexte de transformation des pratiques des adolescents (Octobre 2014, Barrère 2011), le rôle des dispositifs de médiation culturelle connaît une reconfiguration sans précédent, laquelle pourrait être pensée à partir des réflexions issues de ce tournant corporel (Jullier, Leveratto 2010) et d’un nouveau regard porté sur la jeunesse, admettant « l’action propre de l’agency des jeunes (Octobre, Sirota 2013) sur les objets, les dispositifs et les institutions culturelles » (Dahan, Labadie, Octobre 2014 : 41). C’est le postulat de notre travail de recherche : examiner du point de vue des adolescents les postures, les perceptions et les émotions en jeu dans un dispositif d’éducation au cinéma pour permettre d’en repenser les pratiques de médiation. Prenant appui sur une thèse en cours de préparation, cet article aborde donc les multiples façons dont se manifeste l’épreuve corporelle des spectateurs adolescents dans le cadre du dispositif Lycéens et apprentis au cinéma (LAAC) tel qu’il se déploie en Occitanie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".