MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391551870 · doi:10.59247/csol.v1i1.13

Extended Kalman Filter Design to Estimate the Attitude of the Nanosatellite System Using Magnetometer

2023· article· en· W4391551870 on OpenAlexaff
C. Silva, George McKell, Linda Parker

Bibliographic record

VenueControl Systems and Optimization Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsCentennial College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetometerKalman filterControl theory (sociology)Computer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligenceMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of estimating nonlinear systems is an important issue in many engineering applications. One of these applications is in the nanosatellite for Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications, which is used to replace sensors in the event of failure or error. Therefore, the accuracy of pre-filter estimation is of great importance. To control the orientation of a satellite, it is important to estimate the attitude accurately. Time-series estimation is especially important in micro and nanosatellites, whose sensors are usually low-cost and have higher noise levels than high-end sensors. Also, the algorithms should be able to run on systems with very restricted computer power. In this paper, an overview of the algorithms used to determine the attitude of nanosatellites, and especially using only the magnetometer sensor, will be discussed. This paper aims to simulate a nanosatellite system to estimate the magnetic field derivative vector using only the magnetometer data with the desired accuracy. The estimated vectors in the pre-filter, along with the magnetometer sensor data, are used to estimate the attitude of the satellite. The estimation of the state vector consisting of the vector part of quaternion and the angular velocity vector is used for the control calculation. To evaluate the accuracy of this pre-filter, a comparison of the magnetometer vector estimator with the body sensor data has been used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueControl Systems and Optimization LettersSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207