MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391562711 · doi:10.18260/1-2--40425

Remote Laboratory-Based Learning in A Thermal Fluid Course

2024· article· en· W4391562711 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Rafe Biswas, Ola Al‐Shalash, Nael Barakat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityConcordia University
FundersGrand Valley State UniversityAmerican Society for Engineering Education
KeywordsExperiential learningComputer scienceActive learning (machine learning)Process (computing)ComprehensionRemote laboratoryMultimediaSimulationMathematics educationPsychologyWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceThe InternetOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most educators look for experiential learning elements to engage students through interactive concept practice, thus leading their students to reach improved levels of comprehension. The COVID-19 pandemic created a unique challenge for instructors forcing them to adjust their laboratory-based courses and to adapt to a new remote educational medium involving experiential learning. Many innovative ways came to light and were implemented by educators to overcome this challenge. This includes simulations, recorded experiments, and live experiments run by the instructor and watched by students remotely, to name a few.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207