MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391567133 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.388

(403) Pilot Study: Fractional CO2 Laser in the Treatment of Chronic Phase Peyronie’s Disease

2024· article· en· W4391567133 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Y.H. Chan, Abdullah Alhamam, Luke Witherspoon, J Rivers, Ryan Flannigan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeyronie's diseaseMedicineErectile functionPenile curvatureErectile dysfunctionDeformityAdverse effectPenisUrologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Peyronie’s Disease (PD) is a fibrosing disorder of the penis which may result in penile curvature and deformity of the erect penis. Fractional CO2 laser therapy has been used to remodel severe skin scarring and more recently led to improvements in Dupytren’s contractures. Objective We sought to evaluate the safety of Fractional CO2 Laser Therapy in treating Peyronie’s disease. The assessment includes changes in penile curvature, Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) Symptom bother score, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores. Methods This pilot study examined the use of fractional CO2 laser therapy with adjuvant topical triamcinolone (10mg/cc) in patients with PD. Each patient underwent three treatment cycles with 6 weeks interval between each treatment. During the interval time period, patients were required to perform at-home penile modeling three times daily. Penile curvature assessments, self-reported questionnaires and any adverse events were collected at baseline, 24 weeks and 52 weeks. Results A total of 5 patients were included. The mean baseline curvature was 41.80 ± 10.57 degrees and at 24-week follow-up mean curvature was found to be 34.20 ±18.21 degrees, resulting in an 18.1% reduction in curve (p=0.44). Mean IIEF scores were 55.40 ± 14.26 vs. 61.40 ± 6.58, (p=0.234) at baseline and 24-week follow-up, respectively. Similarly, the IIEF erectile function domain scores were 24.40 ± 4.72 vs. 28.60 ±1.52, (p=0.061) at baseline and 24-week, respectively. PDQ symptom bother average scores were 7.6 vs. 5.4 at baseline and 24-week, respectively. Mild adverse effects such as temporary bruising and penile pain were reported. There were no significant adverse events noted. Conclusions Preliminary results, at 24 weeks, suggest that fractionated CO2 laser therapy may serve as a well-tolerated therapy for PD. While this pilot trial was not powered to assess effectiveness, initial results are encouraging. Based upon these findings, a dose escalating phase I clinical trial is warranted to further systematically evaluate the tolerability and utility of Fractional CO2 laser therapy in the treatment of PD. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, Boston Scientific. Allergen/Abvie, Galderma, Johnson and Johnson, Leo, MetOptima, Pfizer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207