MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Delivery of Therapeutics Using Bacteriophage Vectors

2024· preprint· en· W4391572691 on OpenAlexaff
Srividhya Venkataraman, Mehdi Shahgolzari, Afagh Yavari, Kathleen Hefferon

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacteriophageVirologyComputational biologyBiologyComputer scienceGeneticsEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacteriophages are viruses obligately infecting bacteria. They constitute the most numerous categories of biological forms populating our biosphere and are highly diverse and capable of infecting almost all bacteria. Phages make use of their host cell molecular machinery to express their own genes as they lack the ability to independently reproduce themselves. The inimitable characteristics of bacteriophages have enabled them to become propitious tools in biotechnology and genetic engineering. Phages show no tropism for mammalian cells but however, can be easily modified to present targeting ligands on their surface as coat protein fusions without any negative impacts on phage structure. These displayed ligands thereupon guide the recognition, interaction, and internalization of the phage into cells wherein efficiency of transfection is directly influenced by the copy number of the ligands used for targeting. Engineered phages are more efficacious for transgene delivery and gene expression in cancer cells when compared to other non-viral gene transfer strategies and are therefore being employed in developing cancer vaccines. The high level of stability as well as resistance of bacteriophages to various environmental conditions have enabled the development of virus-like particles (VLPs) capable of successful deliverance of several therapeutic drug cargos into tumors by selective targeting. Phage display technology has been used in therapy of Alzheimer’s disease and drug delivery into the brain. Exogenous peptides fused into the coat protein of phages enables the display of these peptides on the phage surface to generate combinatorial phage that facilitates their rapid separation using their ability to bind to a specific molecular target. Phage therapy has been shown to be safe in clinical settings when compared to antibiotics as it shows no adverse anaphylaxis nor adverse effects such as the emergence of multi-drug resistant bacteria. This review provides intriguing details of the use of natural and engineered phages in the therapy of diseases such as cancer, bacterial infections, bovine mastitis and dementia in addition to the use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology in generating genetically engineered phages. Further, the use of phage display technology in generating monoclonal antibodies against various human diseases is elucidated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.org→Same topicBacteriophages and microbial interactions→French-language works237,207→