MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391590377 · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1334864

Editorial: Aerobic and anaerobic fermentation of gaseous and liquid one carbon feedstocks to produce food, feed, biopolymers and value-added products

2024· editorial· en· W4391590377 on OpenAlexaff
Maximilian Lackner, Ildar I. Mustakhimov, Juan B. García Martínez, Stefan Pflügl

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFermentationAnaerobic exerciseVolume (thermodynamics)Carbon fibersPulp and paper industryWaste managementChemistryCarbon sourceEnvironmental scienceBiochemical engineeringFood scienceEngineeringBiologyMaterials sciencePhysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EDITORIAL article Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 06 February 2024Sec. Industrial Biotechnology Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1334864

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Bioengineering and BiotechnologySame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207