When rural gentrifiers blur town-country relations: a transnational approach (France, United Kingdom) and through the circulation of capital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les dynamiques post-productives ou rcratives qui animent dsormais les socits s'inscrivent galement dans les territoires, contribuant leur restructuration et modifier les liens qui les unissent.Suivant cette perspective, cette contribution s'intresse en particulier aux divers groupes socio-culturels qui participent la gentrification d'un certain nombre de campagnes, en France comme ailleurs.Elle s'appuie sur un ensemble de travaux (y compris ceux conduits dans le cadre de l'ANR iRGENT) inter et transnationaux (France, Royaume-Uni, Etats-Unis) en visant plusieurs objectifs.Le premier consiste intgrer une perspective critique l'analyse des recompositions sociales des espaces ruraux en recourant aux notions de gentrification rurale et de capital environnemental.Au regard de cette double approche, il est possible dans un deuxime temps de formuler une proposition thorique quelque peu htrodoxe : pour les gentrifieursses rurauxales au moins, par le biais de la circulation des capitaux et de leur investissement dans le capital environnemental qu'incarneraient les campagnes, les villes ne seraient plus que des priphries des espaces ruraux.Deux cas d'tudes trs diffrents (les campagnes anglo-galloises et l'Anjou Sud-Loire en France) viennent illustrer cette proposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".