Europa's Double Ridges Produced by Ice Wedging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Double ridges are sprawling features observed globally across the icy surface of Europa. They consist of two topographic highs flanking a trough. The topographic relief of the ridges is approximately 100 m, and the ridges extend up to hundreds of kilometers in length. The interior structure and dynamics of Europa's ice shell are currently poorly constrained. Therefore, accurate models for the formation of these prominent surface features can be useful for determining how the ice shell operates. We hypothesize that double ridges form as a result of incremental ice wedging. We use both analytical and numerical finite element models to quantify the deformation that occurs as an ice wedge grows incrementally within the ice shell. We show that incremental growth of the ice wedge results in surface deformation that matches the size and shape of typical Europan double ridges, including their topographic relief and surrounding troughs. We find that as the depth of the ice wedge increases, double ridges become broader and shorter. We explore the possibility of local and non‐local sources for the liquid water that freezes to produce the wedge and ultimately argue in favor of local sources of liquid water within the ice shell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".