Association between Subjective Cognitive Complaints and Incident Functional Impairment in Parkinson's Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early identification of subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) in Parkinson's disease (PD) may improve patient care if it predicts cognition-related functional impairment (CFI). OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between SCC and CFI in PD. METHODS: Data were obtained from Fox Insight, an online longitudinal study that collects PD patient-reported outcomes. Participants completed a PD Patient Report of Problems that asked participants for their five most bothersome disease problems. SCCs were placed into eight categories through human-in-the-loop curation and classification. CFI had a Penn Parkinson's Daily Activities Questionnaire (PDAQ-15) score ≤49. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses determined if baseline SCC was associated with incident CFI. RESULTS: The PD-PROP cohort (N = 21,160) was 55.8% male, mean age was 65.9 years, and PD duration was 4.8 years. At baseline, 31.9% (N = 6750) of participants reported one or more SCCs among their five most bothersome problems, including memory (13.2%), language/word finding (12.5%), and concentration/attention (9.6%). CFI occurred in 34.7% (N = 7332) of participants. At baseline, SCC was associated with CFI (P-value <0.001). SCC at baseline was associated with incident CFI (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.58 [95% confidence interval: 1.45, 1.72], P-value <0.001), as did cognitive impairment not otherwise specified (HR = 2.31), executive abilities (HR = 1.97), memory (HR = 1.85), and cognitive slowing (HR = 1.77) (P-values <0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that by year 3 an estimated 45% of participants with any SCC at baseline developed new-onset CFI. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported bothersome cognitive complaints are associated with new-onset CFI in PD. Remote electronic assessment can facilitate widespread use of patient self-report at population scale. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".