MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391613321 · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.12.008

Reply to “Exploring the long-term effects of biologic initiation in severe asthma: Insights from the International Severe Asthma Registry”

2024· letter· en· W4391613321 on OpenAlexaff
Wenjia Chen, Trung N. Tran, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Ruth Murray, Nigel Chong Boon Wong, Nasloon Ali, Con Ariti, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, Esther García Gil, J. Mark FitzGerald, Marianna Alacqua, Mona Al‐Ahmad, Alan Altraja, Riyad Al‐Lehebi, Mohit Bhutani, Leif Bjermer, Anne‐Sofie Bjerrum, Arnaud Bourdin, Anna von Bülow, John Busby, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Victoria Carter, George Christoff, Borja G. Cosío, Richard W. Costello, João Fonseca, Peter G. Gibson, Kwang Ha Yoo, Liam G. Heaney, Enrico Heffler, Mark Hew, Ole Hilberg, Flavia Hoyte, Takashi Iwanaga, David J. Jackson, Rupert Jones, Mariko Siyue Koh, Piotr Kuna, Désirée Larenas‐Linnemann, Sverre Lehmann, Lauri Lehtimäki, Juntao Lyu, Bassam Mahboub, Jorge Máspero, Andrew Menzies‐Gow, A Newell, Concetta Sirena, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, Andriana Ι. Papaioannou, Luis Pérez de Llano, Diahn‐Warng Perng, Matthew Peters, Paul Pfeffer, Celeste Porsbjerg, Todor A. Popov, Chin Kook Rhee, Sundeep Salvi, Camille Taillé, Christian Taube, Carlos A. Torres‐Duque, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Seung Won, Eileen Wang, Michael E. Wechsler, David Price

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersGenentechGrifolsGlenmark PharmaceuticalsSanofi GenzymeIncyteCerecorCovis PharmaRegeneron PharmaceuticalsTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesEfficacy and Mechanism Evaluation ProgrammeOptimum Patient CareHealth Technology Assessment ProgrammeSanofiAstraZenecaAmgenAKL Research and DevelopmentPfizerGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaGuidelineAllergyScopusOmalizumabPediatricsInhaled corticosteroidsIntensive care medicineMEDLINEInternal medicineImmunologyPathologyImmunoglobulin E

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0410.035
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In PracticeSame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207