MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391619967 · doi:10.1142/s0218127424500044

Global Analysis of Riccati Quadratic Differential Systems

2024· article· en· W4391619967 on OpenAlex
Joan C. Artés, Jaume Llibre, Dana Schlomiuk, Nicolae Vulpe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónGeneralitat de CatalunyaAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeAgenția Națională pentru Cercetare și Dezvoltare
KeywordsMathematicsRiccati equationQuadratic equationDifferential (mechanical device)Applied mathematicsQuadratic differentialLinear-quadratic regulatorControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisDifferential equationMathematical optimizationOptimal controlComputer scienceControl (management)PhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the family of quadratic Riccati differential systems. Our goal is to obtain the complete topological classification of this family on the Poincaré disk compactification of the plane. The family was partially studied before but never from a truly global viewpoint. Our approach is global and we use geometry to achieve our goal. The geometric analysis we perform is via the presence of two invariant parallel straight lines in any generic Riccati system. We obtain a total of 119 topologically distinct phase portraits for this family. Furthermore, we give the complete bifurcation diagram in the 12-dimensional space of parameters of this family in terms of invariant polynomials, meaning that it is independent of the normal forms in which the systems may be presented. This bifurcation diagram provides an algorithm to decide for any given quadratic system in any form it may be presented, whether it is a Riccati system or not, and in case it is to provide its phase portrait.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it