Mindfulness based intervention reduce anxiety in labor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To determine the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions on anxiety through a systematic review. Systematic review by searching articles through the PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, Wiley Library, Sage Journal, and Cochrane Library databases with publication years January 2012 to January 2022 Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria covering several countries, including Canada 1 article, Egypt 1 article, Taiwan 1 article, Amsterdam 2 articles, Iran 1 article, Austria 1 article, San Francisco 1 article, Germany 1 article, Sweden 1 article, China 1 article, and Spain 1 article. Management of anxiety about childbirth is important for pregnant women. Mindfulness interventions are effective for reducing anxiety about labor and increasing comfort during labor. Mindfulness intervention mechanisms have the potential to reduce anxiety by increasing skills to regulate emotions. Determinar la efectividad de las intervenciones de mindfulness en la ansiedad, el dolor de parto y el resultado neonatal a través de una revisión sistemática. Revisión sistemática mediante búsqueda de artículos en las bases de datos PubMed, ProQuest, Science Direct, Wiley Library, Sage Journal y Cochrane Library entre enero de 2012 y enero de 2022. Once artículos cumplieron los criterios de inclusión, que corresponden a diversos países, incluyendo Canadá 1 artículo, Egipto 1 artículo, Taiwán 1 artículo, Ámsterdam 2 artículos, Irán 1 artículo, Austria 1 artículo, San Francisco 1 artículo, Alemania 1 artículo, Suecia 1 artículo, China 1 artículo y España 1 artículo. El manejo de la ansiedad debida al parto es importante para las gestantes. Las intervenciones de mindfulness son efectivas para reducir la ansiedad ante el trabajo de parto y aumentar la comodidad durante este. Los mecanismos de intervención de mindfulness tienen el potencial de reducir la ansiedad al aumentar las habilidades para regular las emociones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".