“The Photographer Clicks, and…” (from the history of the fountain in Sudak)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three photographs of different years have fixed the same sightseeing located in the vicinity of the Sudak Fortress — the fountain in the territory of the former German colony in the village Uyutnoe. They are an eloquent demonstration of the metamorphoses this structure has been exposed to during over 150 years of its existence, and what’ s more, how the children’s entertainment and home duties have strikingly transformed over this time. All three shots exhibit one permanent feature, i.e. a carved architectural detail of unknown origin, reutilized by the builders as a decorative element of masonry in the fountain. The spolia is a well preserved fragment of a 215 cm high door framing. Its frame exceeded the plane of the wall just by 2 cm. The item can be dated within the third quarter of the 14th century, although some wider chronological span is also possible, partly extending into the 15th century. It would be challenging to identify the donor building with any degree of certainty, yet it is quite likely that it was the Mosque of the Sudak Fortress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".