MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

BODY PERCEPTION; OVERWEIGHT AND OBESITY ‐ CHILDREN, THEIR PARENTS AND PHYSICIANS

2006· article· en· W4391630954 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca Chaimovitz, Tina Moffat, Robert M. Issenman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Lifestyle Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOverweightObesityPerceptionPediatricsFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Copper (Cu) supplementation in the parenteral nutrition (PN) of infants with cholestasis is reduced or eliminated.It has been suggested that a regular dose of Cu in this setting can lead to toxicity.However, this is based on limited data and there are published series of Cu deficiency in infants due to Cu reduction in their PN.Objectives: 1) To determine the prevalence of elevated serum Cu level in cholestatic infants receiving the regular dose of 20 Kg/kg/d of Cu via PN.2) To determine predictors of serum Cu level in cholestatic infants.Methods: This is a retrospective review of 28 cholestatic infants receiving 20 Kg/kg/d of Cu via PN.Age-adjusted references were used to determine normality of serum Cu levels.In the presence of serial Cu measurements, the last measurement was included for analysis.Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of serum Cu and alanine aminotransferase (ALT).Results: The mean (Tstandard deviation) gestational age was 30 (T4) weeks.The mean chronological age at the time of evaluation was 113 days (range 41Y261 days); also the mean follow-up duration.Serum Cu levels were elevated in 2 infants (7%).Stepwise multiple regression analysis identified birth weight and the diagnosis of malabsorption syndromes as predictors of serum Cu (R 2 = 0.45).The duration of PN and degree of cholestasis did not contribute to this model.Serum Cu, a previous episode of sepsis and direct bilirubin were identified as predictors of ALT elevation (R 2 = 0.56).After the 2 infants with elevated serum Cu were excluded, serum Cu dropped out of the model as a predictor of ALT.Conclusions: The prevalence of elevated serum Cu level in this group was not as high as anticipated.Surprisingly, the diagnosis of malabsorption syndromes strongly predicted higher serum Cu whereas a longer duration of PN did not.These findings highlight the need for a prospective study to assess the impact of variable doses of parenteral Cu on liver disease in infants with cholestasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionSame topicHealth and Lifestyle StudiesFrench-language works237,207