MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comment on egusphere-2023-2912

2024· peer-review· en· W4391636392 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karolin Voss, Philip Holzbeck, Klaus Pfeilsticker, Ralph Kleinschek, G. Wetzel, Blanca Fuentes Andrade, Michael Höpfner, Jörn Ungermann, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, André Butz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Commission
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> We report on a novel, medium weight (&sim; 25 kg) optical spectrometer coupled to an automated sun tracker (&sim; 12 kg) for direct sun observations from azimuth controlled balloon platforms. It is designed to measure a suite of UV/vis absorbing gases (O<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, BrO, OClO, HONO and IO) relevant in the context of stratospheric ozone depletion using the DOAS method. Here, we describe the design and major features of the instrument. Further, the instrument&rsquo;s performance during two stratospheric deployments from Esrange/Kiruna (Sweden) on 21 August 2021 and from Timmins (Ontario, Canada) on 23 August 2022 are discussed along with first results concerning inferred mixing ratios of BrO above balloon float altitude. Using a photochemical correction for the partitioning of stratospheric bromine ([BrO]/[Br<sub>y</sub>]) obtained by chemical transport simulations, the inferred total stratospheric bromine load [Br<sub>y</sub>] amounts to (17.5 &plusmn; 2.2) ppt (pure statistical error amounts to 1.5 ppt) in (5.5&plusmn;1.0) yrs old air, resulting in a stratospheric entry early 2017&plusmn;1 yr, the latter being inferred from simultaneous measurements of N<sub>2</sub>O by the GLORIA mid-IR instrument.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3150.055

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEarthquake Detection and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207