MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comment on egusphere-2023-2912

2024· peer-review· en· W4391636392 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karolin Voss, Philip Holzbeck, Klaus Pfeilsticker, Ralph Kleinschek, G. Wetzel, Blanca Fuentes Andrade, Michael Höpfner, Jörn Ungermann, Björn-Martin Sinnhuber, André Butz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Commission
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. We report on a novel, medium weight (∼ 25 kg) optical spectrometer coupled to an automated sun tracker (∼ 12 kg) for direct sun observations from azimuth controlled balloon platforms. It is designed to measure a suite of UV/vis absorbing gases (O3, NO2, BrO, OClO, HONO and IO) relevant in the context of stratospheric ozone depletion using the DOAS method. Here, we describe the design and major features of the instrument. Further, the instrument’s performance during two stratospheric deployments from Esrange/Kiruna (Sweden) on 21 August 2021 and from Timmins (Ontario, Canada) on 23 August 2022 are discussed along with first results concerning inferred mixing ratios of BrO above balloon float altitude. Using a photochemical correction for the partitioning of stratospheric bromine ([BrO]/[Bry]) obtained by chemical transport simulations, the inferred total stratospheric bromine load [Bry] amounts to (17.5 ± 2.2) ppt (pure statistical error amounts to 1.5 ppt) in (5.5±1.0) yrs old air, resulting in a stratospheric entry early 2017±1 yr, the latter being inferred from simultaneous measurements of N2O by the GLORIA mid-IR instrument.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0160.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3550.240

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEarthquake Detection and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207