MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391638306 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-02552699mtgabs

In Situ Surface X-Ray Diffraction Studies of the Electrochemical Double Layer on Pt(111)

2023· article· en· W4391638306 on OpenAlexaff
Finn Schröter, Jan Ole Fehrs, Timo Fuchs, Jakub Drnec, Andrea Sartori, Olvido Irrazábal Moreda, David A. Harrington, Olaf M. Magnussen

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSurface and Thin Film Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrochemistryIn situDiffractionX-rayDouble layer (biology)Layer (electronics)Materials sciencePlatinumX-ray crystallographyCrystallographyChemistryOpticsElectrodeNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The molecular structure of the electrochemical double layer is an important fundamental topic in interfacial electrochemistry. It has received renewed interest in the last years, because of its influence on many electrochemical reactions and the emergence of ab initio molecular dynamics simulations that allow a detailed description of the interface structure and dynamics [1,2]. In the measurements presented here, we investigated the properties of the electrochemical double layer on Pt(111) via in situ surface X-ray diffraction (SXRD), a technique that is well-established for single crystal studies [3-7]. Platinum electrodes are widely used as electrocatalysts, for example as cathodes in proton exchange membrane fuel cells due to their high ORR reactivity. The single-crystalline Pt(111) surface, which is a well studied model system, is especially interesting for studies of the electrochemical double layer. Recent electrochemical measurements revisited this system and found evidence for a double layer structure that strongly deviated from the traditional Gouy-Chapman-Stern model and indicated a complex structural influence of water [8,9]. The water structure within the electrochemical double layer is also of major interest in computational studies. For non-adsorbing, aqueous electrolyte the electrode surface charge can be partly compensated by a layer of oriented water molecules due to their dipole moment. For potentials around the potential of zero charge (PZC), a potential-dependent orientation of water molecules with respect to the electrode surface was suggested [1,2,10]. To investigate the arrangement and orientation of the water molecules near the Pt(111) surface we used in situ SXRD methods, focussing on X-ray reflectivity (XRR) and crystal truncation rod (CTR) analysis. These methods allow to acquire detailed information about the electrode surface structure as well as the electrochemical double layer. By measuring multiple CTR sets at different surface potentials, information on the potential-dependence of the interface processes can be obtained. The experiments were performed at beamline ID31 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility using high photon energies of 75 keV, which provide very large data sets. This allows significantly improved structural modeling as compared to conventional SXRD. The studies employed an electrochemical hanging-meniscus X-ray diffraction cell that allows for SXRD measurements of fast dynamic systems in a well-defined electrochemical environment. We will report results on the water structure in the double layer obtained in perchloric acid at potentials around the PZC. We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft via project no. 418603497 and the BMBF via 05K19FK3 and 05K22FK1. References [1] A. Groß, S. Sakong, Chem. Rev. 122 (2022) 10746. [2] R. Sundararaman et al., Chem. Rev 122, (2022) 10651. [3] J. Drnec et al, Electrochim. Acta, 224 (2017) 22. [4] M. Ruge et al., J. Electrochem. Soc., 164 (2017) H608. [5] J. Drnec et al., Current Opinion Electrochem., 4 (2017) 69. [6] J. Drnec et al., Electrochem. Comm., 84 (2017) 8577, ibid 100, 4699. [7] Y. Liu, et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, (2018) 1265. [8] K. Ojha et al., PNAS 119 (2022) e2116016119. [9] K. Ojha et al., Angew. 59 (2020) 711. [10] A. Bouzid et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, (2018) 1880.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicSurface and Thin Film PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207