MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391639042 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-02582802mtgabs

Zn-Based Catalysts for Selective and Stable Electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction at High Current Densities

2023· article· en· W4391639042 on OpenAlexaff
Ilias Stamatelos, Cao‐Thang Dinh, Werner Lehnert, Joachim Pasel, Meital Shviro

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrochemistryReduction (mathematics)CatalysisMaterials scienceCurrent (fluid)Chemical engineeringChemistryElectrodePhysical chemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineeringMathematicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of low-cost and stable catalysts is important for lowering the capital and operational cost of CO2 electro-reduction (ECR). Zinc (Zn) is an earth-abundant metal, with promising performance for the CO2-to-CO conversion.1 Zinc oxide (ZnO) has been recently employed for the CO2-to-CO conversion, recording promising selectivity (FECO) but short-term stability, in Flow-Cell configuration.2,3 ZnO phase has been proven critical for competent ECR performance, since both the oxidation state of Zn and the Zn/ZnO interface are proven critical for high FECO. 4,5In our work 6, we have synthesised various ZnO allotropes, the properties of which induced differences in their ECR performance. We have identified the ZnO nanorods (ZnO-NR) as the best performing catalyst. The latter was implemented in a zero-gap ECR electrolyser (MEA), recording partial current density for CO (jCO) of 160 mA cm-2 at cell voltage of 3.6 V. We have correlated the depletion of the ZnO phase in the MEA with the degradation of the performance (initially 15 h stability). We applied a periodic oxidation protocol in the MEA, causing the regeneration of ZnO-phase, allowing us to prolong the life-time of the catalyst. Through our strategy we were able to record 82% CO selectivity (FECO) for over 100 h, at -160 mA cm-2. This work provides an approach of practical use of inexpensive Zn-based catalysts for large-scale ECR applications. (1) Luo, W.; Zhang, J.; Li, M.; Züttel, A. Boosting CO Production in Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction on Highly Porous Zn Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2019, 9 (5), 3783–3791. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b05109. (2) Zeng, J.; Fontana, M.; Sacco, A.; Sassone, D.; Pirri, C. F. A Study of the Effect of Electrode Composition on the Electrochemical Reduction of CO2. Catalysis Today 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2021.07.014. (3) Zong, X.; Jin, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Xie, H.; Zhang, J.; Xiong, Y. Morphology-Controllable ZnO Catalysts Enriched with Oxygen-Vacancies for Boosting CO2 Electroreduction to CO. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2022, 61, 102051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102051. (4) Nguyen, D. L. T.; Jee, M. S.; Won, D. H.; Jung, H.; Oh, H.-S.; Min, B. K.; Hwang, Y. J. Selective CO2 Reduction on Zinc Electrocatalyst: The Effect of Zinc Oxidation State Induced by Pretreatment Environment. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2017, 5 (12), 11377–11386. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02460. (5) Geng, Z.; Kong, X.; Chen, W.; Su, H.; Liu, Y.; Cai, F.; Wang, G.; Zeng, J. Oxygen Vacancies in ZnO Nanosheets Enhance CO2 Electrochemical Reduction to CO. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2018, 57 (21), 6054–6059. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201711255. (6) Stamatelos, I.; Dinh, C.-T.; Lehnert, W.; Shviro, M. Zn-Based Catalysts for Selective and Stable Electrochemical CO2 Reduction at High Current Densities. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c02557. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207