MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391639520 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-02121099mtgabs

Dynamic Change in Throwing Power for the Cu-to-Carbon Steel Galvanic Couple in the Presence of Bentonite

2023· article· en· W4391639520 on OpenAlexaffabout
Xuejie Li, Xinran Pan, Fraser P. Filice, Dmitrij Zagidulin, Sina Matin, James J. Noël

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalvanic cellThrowingBentoniteCarbon steelMaterials sciencePower (physics)Carbon fibersMetallurgyComposite materialEngineeringChemical engineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsThermodynamicsCorrosion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In galvanic corrosion, the maximum distance from the periphery of the cathode to the anode is often defined as the throwing power. It dictates the surface area of the cathode involved in the galvanic corrosion and is also related to the extent of the accelerated anodic reaction. Therefore, its estimation is of great interest and importance in engineering applications, such as fastener and panel assembly [1], metal coatings [2], buried metallic structures [3], etc. Throwing power may be estimated experimentally by measuring the solution potential variation in close proximity to the electrode surface (E s ) or through modelling, such as finite element analysis (FEA), provided the boundary conditions (polarization characteristics) are correctly determined. In this work, we investigated the throwing power for the Cu-to-carbon steel galvanic couple in the presence of bentonite clay, a scenario that could arise in the vicinity of a through-coating defect in the Canadian-designed nuclear waste container. Using a homemade micro-reference electrode array coupled to a Multichannel Microelectrode Analyzer (MMA), E s was measured simultaneously in 10 locations as a function of time in 0.1 M NaCl solution with and without bentonite clay, Fig. 1. Transient potential peaks were found when bentonite clay was added to the solution and are attributed to the increased galvanic activities driven by the reduction of air-formed Cu oxides. We further investigated this phenomenon using FEA. Boundary conditions were established experimentally under circumstances reflecting the actual surface states, i.e., with or without Cu oxides. Simulations were conducted considering secondary current distribution, using the appropriate boundary conditions. The obtained results match well with the experimental measurements, including the peak and the stable E s . Additionally, the dynamic change of the throwing power due to the evolution of the surface state was investigated through simulation and discussed. Reference [1] R.S. Marshall, A. Goff, C. Sprinkle, A. Britos, R.G. Kelly, Estimating the Throwing Power of SS316 when Coupled with AA7075 Through Finite Element Modeling, Corrosion, 76 (2020) 476-484. [2] J.R. Scully, F. Presuel-Moreno, M. Goldman, R.G. Kelly, N. Tailleart, User-Selectable Barrier, Sacrificial Anode, and Active Corrosion Inhibiting Properties of Al-Co-Ce Alloys for Coating Applications, Corrosion, 64 (2008) 210-229. [3] L. Liu, J. Li, M. Peng, W. Li, B. Lei, G. Meng, Macro-galvanic corrosion of tower grounding device consisting of graphite and Zn-coated steel in a simulated soil environment, Engineering Failure Analysis, 135 (2022) 106136. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207