Multi-domain neurocognitive impairment following definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: A cross-sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Neurocognitive impairment from inadvertent brain irradiation is common following intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed to determine the prevalence, pattern, and radiation dose-toxicity relationship of this late complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a cross-sectional study of 190 post-IMRT NPC survivors. Neurocognitive function was screened using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Hong Kong (HK-MoCA). Detailed assessments of eight distinct neurocognitive domains were conducted: intellectual capacity (WAIS-IV), attention span (Digit Span and Visual Spatial Span), visual memory (Visual Reproduction Span), verbal memory (Auditory Verbal Learning Test), processing speed (Color Trail Test), executive function (Stroop Test), motor dexterity (Grooved Pegboard Test) and language ability (Verbal Fluency Test). The mean percentiles and Z-scores were compared with normative population data. Associations between radiation dose and brain substructures were explored using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The median post-IMRT interval was 7.0 years. The prevalence of impaired HK-MoCA was 25.3 % (48/190). Among the participants, 151 (79.4 %) exhibited impairments in at least one neurocognitive domain. The predominantly impaired domains included verbal memory (short-term: mean Z-score, -0.56, p < 0.001; long-term: mean Z-score, -0.70, p < 0.001), processing speed (basic: mean Z-score, -1.04, p < 0.001; advanced: mean Z-score, -0.38, p < 0.001), executive function (mean Z-score, -1.90, p < 0.001), and motor dexterity (dominant hand: mean Z-score, -0.97, p < 0.001). Radiation dose to the whole brain, hippocampus, and temporal lobe was associated with impairments in executive function, verbal memory, processing speed, and motor dexterity. CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive impairment is prevalent and profound in post-IMRT NPC survivors. Cognitive assessment and rehabilitation should be considered part of survivorship care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".