MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391655713 · doi:10.1183/13993003.02301-2023

Cluster analysis to identify long COVID phenotypes using<sup>129</sup>Xe magnetic resonance imaging: a multicentre evaluation

2024· article· en· W4391655713 on OpenAlexafffund
Rachel L. Eddy, David Mummy, Shuo Zhang, Haoran Dai, Aryil Bechtel, Alexandra M. Schmidt, Bradie Frizzell, Firoozeh V. Gerayeli, Jonathon Leipsic, Janice M. Leung, Bastiaan Driehuys, Loretta G. Que, Mario Castro, Don D. Sin, Peter Niedbalski

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDuke HealthSt. Paul's Foundation
KeywordsMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Magnetic resonance imagingCluster (spacecraft)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PhenotypeNuclear magnetic resonanceNuclear medicineVirologyRadiologyPathologyPhysicsGeneticsOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Long COVID impacts ∼10% of people diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet the pathophysiology driving ongoing symptoms is poorly understood. We hypothesised that 129 Xe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could identify unique pulmonary phenotypic subgroups of long COVID. Therefore, we evaluated ventilation and gas exchange measurements with cluster analysis to generate imaging-based phenotypes. Methods COVID-negative controls and participants who previously tested positive for COVID-19 underwent 129 Xe MRI ∼14 months post-acute infection across three centres. Long COVID was defined as persistent dyspnoea, chest tightness, cough, fatigue, nausea and/or loss of taste/smell at MRI; participants reporting no symptoms were considered fully recovered. 129 Xe MRI ventilation defect percent (VDP) and membrane-to-gas (Mem/Gas), red blood cell-to-membrane (RBC/Mem) and red blood cell-to-gas (RBC/Gas) ratios were used in k-means clustering for long COVID, and measurements were compared using ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni correction. Results We evaluated 135 participants across three centres: 28 COVID-negative (mean± sd age 40±16 years), 34 fully recovered (42±14 years) and 73 long COVID (49±13 years). RBC/Mem (p=0.03) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) (p=0.04) were different between long COVID and COVID-negative; FEV 1 and all other pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were within normal ranges. Four unique long COVID clusters were identified compared with recovered and COVID-negative. Cluster 1 was the youngest with normal MRI and mild gas trapping; Cluster 2 was the oldest, characterised by reduced RBC/Mem but normal PFTs; Cluster 3 had mildly increased Mem/Gas with normal PFTs; and Cluster 4 had markedly increased Mem/Gas with concomitant reduction in RBC/Mem and restrictive PFT pattern. Conclusions We identified four 129 Xe MRI long COVID phenotypes with distinct characteristics. 129 Xe MRI can dissect pathophysiological heterogeneity of long COVID to enable personalised patient care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory JournalSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207