Leaf developmental patterns of two species of <i>Baccharis</i> (Asteraceae): an analysis based on cell wall pectins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cell wall plays a primary role in plant growth, which is regulated by cellulose microfibrils, proteins, and pectins. Regarding pectins, the rate of homogalacturonan (HG) methylesterification and the type of rhamnogalacturonan side chains can mediate leaf development. Herein, we evaluated pectic compounds of the cell walls by immunocytochemistry during the leaf development of Baccharis dracunculifolia DC. and Baccharis platypoda DC. Leaves in different maturation stages (from leaf bud to 9th node) were collected in a rupestrian field and fixed in formalin, acetic acid for anatomical and immunocytochemical analyses using monoclonal antibodies (JIM5, JIM7, LM5, and LM6). Both species showed similar anatomical structures based on peculiar cell wall pectic matrices. Baccharis platypoda leaves reach precocious maturation in the 3rd node, while B. dracunculifolia reaches maturation in the 6th node. These results seem to be related to HGs already de-methylesterified in the leaf primordia located in the leaf bud of B. platypoda. Epitopes of (1→5) α-l-arabinan occurred only in the collenchyma of B. platypoda, supporting cell wall stability. (1→4) β-D-galactans showed different fluorescence intensities in the two species, which changed during leaf development. The different rates of leaf tissue maturation between the two Baccharis species are influenced by variations in the pectic compounds of the cell walls, especially regarding the rate of HG methylesterification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".