MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391662557 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-022263mtgabs

All Dry in One Step (ADIOS to Water) Synthesis of W-Coated Li<sub>1+X</sub>(Ni<sub>0.7</sub>Mn<sub>0.3</sub>)<sub>1-X</sub>O<sub>2</sub>

2023· article· en· W4391662557 on OpenAlexaff
Svena Yu, Ning Zhang, Matthew D. L. Garayt, Kate Leslie, Chongyin Yang, J. R. Dahn

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cathode powders for lithium-ion batteries are typically made from hydroxide precursors with the intended transition metal composition and calcined with a lithium source at high temperatures to make LiMO2, where M = Ni, Mn, Co. However, large amounts of process water and salts like NaOH are used in the co-precipitation process employed to make these hydroxide precursors1. Purifying and drying the precursors after co-precipitation requires additional energy input and produces waste streams that are difficult to treat, as illustrated in Fig. 1a. In this work, we introduce a simple, solvent-free method to produce tungsten (W) coated Li1+x(Ni0.7Mn0.3)1-xO2 (NM73) materials from a mixture of Ni, MnO2, LiOH·H2O and W precursors. NM73 was chosen as the primary focus of investigation so that cobalt is avoided due to its scarcity and high cost. The starting reagents are dry mixed and calcined, followed by jet-milling. An extra reheating step after jet-milling is advantageous for minimizing cation disorder and lithium surface impurities. Pure phase, R -3m single crystal NM73 materials can be made with this method and Rietveld refinement analysis showed that low Ni/Li mixing was achieved. W is believed to remain at the surface, forming a separate LixWyOz phase2. The addition of W was found to reduce the mean particle size and improve both the initial discharge capacity and first cycle efficiency. Small amounts of W increase the initial discharge capacity up to 197 mAh/g. Full coin cells were made from both coated and uncoated materials. Their cycling performance is shown in Fig. 1b, revealing improved capacity retention as another improvement afforded by the W coating. The proposed method simplifies the current production process of LiMO2 by eliminating the need for hydroxide precursors entirely. Cobalt-free single crystal materials with excellent electrochemical performance can be made all-dry in one step, potentially reducing the cost of cathode materials significantly and eliminating waste streams. References: Ahmed Shabbir et al 2017 Power Sources 342, 733–740 Divya Rathore et al2021 Electrochem. Soc. 168 120514 Figure 1. (a) Typical industrial co-precipitation process flow with input and output streams for each step. The red box represents the steps in the ADIOS process and inputs specific to the process are shown in red. (b) Full coin cell cycling from 3 — 4.3V, C/5 rate used. N:P ratio of 1.1 and no anode overhang used. Electrolyte used is 1.5M LiPF6, 25:5:70 EC:EMC:DMC, 2% VC + 1% DTD. The top graph shows the specific capacity vs. cycle number up to the 100th cycle. The bottom graph shows the voltage (vs. Li) vs. specific capacity of the first cycle at C/20 rate from 3 — 4.4 V in half coin cells with lithium metal as the anode. Electrolyte used is 1.2M LiPF6, 1:4 FEC:DMC. Both full and half coin cells were cycled at 30 ˚C. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicAdvancements in Battery Materials→French-language works237,207→