MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391662749 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-0283381mtgabs

Stability of Alizarin for Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries

2023· article· en· W4391662749 on OpenAlexaff
Meysam Maleki, Sarah Imhanria, Lisa Duguet, Marc‐Antoni Goulet

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedoxAqueous solutionChemistryALIZARIN REDAlizarinFlow (mathematics)Chemical engineeringEnvironmental chemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryEngineeringBiologyMathematicsStaining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intermittent nature of renewable energy sources like solar and wind requires suitable large-scale energy storage technologies to properly respond supply and demand of energy. Aqueous organic redox flow batteries (AORFBs) have demonstrated great potential to revolutionize grid-scale energy storage as a result of their low-cost, safety and ability to separate energy and power 1 . However, most of the organic compounds suffer from lack of sufficient long-term stability. Alizarin ( 1,2-dihydroxyanthraquinone ) is a low-cost, nontoxic, and industrially accessible dye which could potentially be used as an affordable redox-active negative electrolye (negolyte) 2 . Here, we present an in-depth investigation on the long-term cycling stability of Alizarin. Furthermore, we implement an aggressive cycling conditions to investigate the degradation of the cycled negolyte within just a single day, achieving an equivalent capacity fade percentage as electrolyte cycled for over two weeks 3 . The capacity fade of alizarin was partially mitigated by the employment of a SOC restriction strategy which was able to decrease the capacity fade rate by more than 60 %. 4 Capacity fade measured via cycling is corroborated by ex situ chemical analysis methods. References: (1) Kwabi, D. G.; Ji, Y.; Aziz, M. J. Electrolyte Lifetime in Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries: A Critical Review. Chem. Rev. 2020 , 120 (14), 6467–6489. (2) Liu, Y.; Lu, S.; Chen, S.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, Y. A Sustainable Redox Flow Battery with Alizarin-Based Aqueous Organic Electrolyte. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019 , 2 (4), (3) Goulet, M.-A.; Aziz, M. J. Flow Battery Molecular Reactant Stability Determined by Symmetric Cell Cycling Methods. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018 , 165 (7), A1466–A1477. (4) Goulet, M.-A.; Tong, L.; Pollack, D. A.; Tabor, D. P.; Odom, S. A.; Aspuru-Guzik, A.; Kwan, E. E.; Gordon, R. G.; Aziz, M. J. Extending the Lifetime of Organic Flow Batteries via Redox State Management. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019 , 141 (20), 8014–8019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.653

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207