MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391666334 · doi:10.2208/jscejj.23-23190

APPLICABILITY OF CROSS-SECTORAL MANAGEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURES IN MUNICIPALITIES

2023· article· en· W4391666334 on OpenAlexaff
Hironobu INAGAKI, Kotaro Sasai, Kiyoyuki KAITO, Takaya Yamamura

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of JSCE · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPublic Procurement and Policy
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessEnvironmental planningEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

老朽化が進む社会基盤施設を効率的に管理するための一方策として,複数分野の社会基盤施設を分野横断的に管理する手法がある.本研究では,社会基盤施設の分野横断的管理のメリット・デメリットを俯瞰的に言及する.また,分野横断的管理の実現を後押ししうる外部環境変化についても整理し,依然として各所管省庁の縦割り,用途変更に伴う補助金の返還義務など,制度的課題は残存しつつも,公会計の整備,PFI法改正,DXの発展などに伴い,その導入に向けた技術・制度の推進状況が向上していることを指摘する.さらに,分野横断的管理導入の効果を定量的に評価するための簡易シミュレーションを実施して,分野間の融通によるリスクファイナンスや,更新ピークの時間的分散効果による更新費の平準化の可能性を示す.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of JSCESame topicPublic Procurement and PolicyFrench-language works237,207