MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391666339 · doi:10.2208/jscejj.23-23187

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MARKOV CHAIN MODEL ESTIMATION METHODS BASED ON VISUAL INSPECTION DATA

2023· article· en· W4391666339 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of JSCE · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chainComputer scienceVisual inspectionMarkov chain Monte CarloMarkov modelArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

社会基盤施設の統計的劣化予測では,目視点検データを用いてマルコフ推移確率を推定し,マルコフ連鎖モデルにより劣化過程を記述する方法論が多く提案されているが,各種推定手法の有効性や適用可能性について実データを用いた比較事例は少ない.したがって,実務においてアセットマネジメントを実践する際に劣化予測手法の選択基準が明確であるとは言い難い.また,推定手法には,実務者が自ら適用するにあたって,数学的・技術的な障壁を有する手法が存在する.本研究では,各種推定手法の特長や制約条件について既往研究をもとに整理する.その上で,実点検データを用いて,想定される条件下においてマルコフ推移確率を推定し,各種手法が有効的に機能する条件や,適用が不適切になり得る状況を分析する.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.324
GPT teacher head0.580
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it