Management of Vancouver B3 Periprosthetic Femur Fracture Using a Modular Uncemented Long Femoral Stem Prosthesis With Cerclage Wiring Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Periprosthetic fractures (PPF) of the femur in connection with total hip arthroplasty are becoming common and also frequently challenging to repair. Such patients typically are frail, elderly, and have osteoporosis. Owing to a scarcity of research there are no clear strategies for its effective management. However, the Vancouver classification may help in facilitating treatment decisions. For fractures around a loose femoral prosthesis (types B2 and B3), revision using a modular uncemented long stem, with or without additional fracture fixation, has been known to provide a reliable outcome. It is prudent to treat osteoporosis for fracture healing and to prevent further fractures. In this case report, we share our experience with the use of an uncemented modular long femoral stem prosthesis with a cerclage wiring technique for the management of Vancouver type B3 PPF of the left femur in a 63-year-old male patient. Revision arthroplasty using a long stem prosthesis with a cerclage wiring technique can provide better fixation, stability, and functional outcomes for the patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".