MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391683431 · doi:10.1111/cns.14606

Association between plasma <scp>CTRPs</scp> with cognitive impairment and neurodegeneration of Alzheimer's disease

2024· article· en· W4391683431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiao Huang, Jialing Zhao, Tingqi Yan, Shu Gou, Xiaofeng Zhu, Yang Liu, Fang Ye, Jie Zhang, Yan‐Jiang Wang, Shaojie Yang, Weidong Le, Yang Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueCNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth Commission of Sichuan ProvinceDepartment of Science and Technology of Sichuan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentClinical Dementia RatingInternal medicineLogistic regressionNeurodegenerationDiseaseMini–Mental State ExaminationMedicineCorrelationAlzheimer's diseaseCognitionOncologyReceiver operating characteristicGastroenterologyDementiaPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Recent evidence indicated the biological basis of complement 1q (C1q)/tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related protein (CTRP) 3, 4, and 14 for affecting brain structure and cognitive function. Thus, we aimed to investigate the association between plasma CTRPs with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study recruited patients with AD (n = 137) and cognitively normal (CN) controls (n = 140). After the data collection of demographic characteristics, lifestyle risk factors, and medical history, plasma levels of tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (pT217), pT181, neurofilament light (NfL), CTRP3, 4, and 14 were examined and compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to determine associations of plasma CTPRs with the presence of AD. The correlation analysis was used to explore correlations between plasma CTPRs with scores of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale, and Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), and levels of plasma pT217, pT181, and NfL. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Delong's test were used to determine the diagnostic power of plasma CTPRs. RESULTS: Plasma levels of CTRP3, 4, and 14 were higher in AD group than those in CN group. After adjusting for conventional risk factors, CTRP3, CTRP4, and CTRP14 were associated with the presence of AD. In AD patients, CTRP3 was negatively correlated with scores of MMSE and MoCA, while positively correlated with ADL score, CDR-SB score, pT217, and pT181; CTRP4 was positively correlated with CDR-SB score, pT181, and NfL; CTRP14 was negatively correlated with MMSE score, while positively correlated with CDR-SB score, pT217, and NfL. An independent addition of CTRP3 and 4 to the basic model combining age, sex, years of education, APOE4 status, BMI, TG, and HDL-C led to a significant improvement in diagnostic power for AD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All the findings preliminarily uncovered associations between plasma CTRPs and AD and suggested the potential of CTRPs as a blood-derived biomarker for AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCNS Neuroscience & TherapeuticsSame topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207