Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Fisik dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Guru di SMP Negeri 03 dan SMA Negeri 03 Kecamatan Talang Ubi Kabupaten Penukal Abab Lematang Ilir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of Physical Work Environment and Work Motivation on Teacher Performance in SMP Negeri 03 and SMA Negeri 03 Talang Ubi District, Penukal Abab Lematang Ilir Regency. The population of this study were all teachers at SMP Negeri 03 and SMA Negeri 03. The sample in this study were 36 respondents totaling 56 respondents.. This type of research is Descriptive research with a Quantitative approach. The data used is primary data. Data collection methods using questionnaire techniques. Data analysis techniques are Multiple Linear Regression, F test, Determination Coefficient T test, and Correlation Coefficient test. The results of Multiple Linear Regression Variable Physical Work Environment and Work Motivation have a positive influence on Teacher Performance in SMP Negeri 03 and SMA Negeri 03 Talang Ubi District Penukal Abab Lematang Ilir Regency. The results of the F test analysis show that simultaneously there is a significant effect of Physical Work Environment Variables and Work Motivation have a significant effect on Teacher Performance in State Junior High School 03 and State Senior High School 03 Talang Ubi District Penukal Abab Lematang Ilir Regency. The partial t test results show that the Physical Work Environment and Work Motivation Variables have a significant effect on Teacher Performance in SMP Negeri 03 and SMA Negeri 03, Talang Ubi District, Penukal Abab Lematang Ilir Regency. Analysis of the Coefficient of Determination shows that 67.1% of the variables of Physical Work Environment and Work Motivation affect Teacher Performance in State Junior High School 03 and State Senior High School 03, Talang Ubi District, Penukal Abab Lematang Ilir Regency, while the remaining 32.9% is influenced by other variables not included in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".