Investigating the deformation and microstructural evolution of laser powder-bed fusion of Hastelloy X during high temperature fatigue loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the fatigue behaviour of samples made by laser powder-bed fusion of Hastelloy X (LPBF-HX) with as-built and machined surface conditions at 700°C under fully reversed strain-controlled cyclic loading. Samples with both surface conditions exhibited initially cyclic hardening followed by cyclic softening under large strain amplitude testing, where a slight continuous hardening was observed for tests with smaller strain amplitudes. The samples with machined surfaces showed longer endurance and higher stress ranges than those with as-built surfaces. Post-fatigue-test EBSD analysis showed the formation of the Goss texture and extensive local strain accumulation in the samples tested under high strain amplitude at 700°C. Fractography investigations revealed that early crack initiation in the samples with as-built surfaces was from stress concentrations induced by valleys on the rough surface. No evidence of crack initiation induced by pre-existing defects was observed in the machined samples, and the excessive slip activity at the surface was found to be responsible for the crack initiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".