SING 2019 Talking Circle: Indigenous Perspectives on Chronic Wasting Disease Research and Management in North America
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The Summer Internship for Indigenous Peoples in Genomics Canada (SING Canada) is an annual, weeklong training program organized by the Indigenous Science, Technology, and Society program in the Faculty of Native Studies at the University of Alberta. During the 2019 annual program, Indigenous students, nation members, elders, and early career Indigenous scientists were invited to participate in an intensive training program on chronic wasting disease (CWD) of cervids (deer, moose, elk, and caribou). At the closing of SING Canada 2019, participants collaborated in a talking circle to capture their impressions on the directions of CWD management, research, and engagement of Indigenous peoples in these processes. The results of this discussion indicated that research on CWD lacks Indigenous input, resulting in adverse outcomes for Indigenous people. These findings point to a greater need for Indigenous engagement and consultation on CWD and inclusion of the more holistic Indigenous perspectives that place value and emphasis on the interconnection between living and nonliving beings. By engaging more critical Indigenous perspectives, future directions of CWD research and management can begin to identify and meaningfully address Indigenous peoples' needs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it