MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391721088 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25939

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism following knee arthroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

2024· review· en· W4391721088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yue Zou, Guodong Zhang, Xiujiang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyKnee arthroscopyMeta-analysisVenous thrombosisVenous thromboembolismArthroscopyRisk factorKnee surgerySurgeryPhysical therapyThrombosisInternal medicineOsteoarthritisAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To evaluate the risk factors for increased risk of venous thrombosis after arthroscopic knee surgery. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to April 4, 2023. Observational studies investigated venous thrombosis following arthroscopic knee surgery were included. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. The odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) pertaining to each risk factor were synthesized through a random effects model by STATA 14 software. Results: The protocol this meta-analysis has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023410283). A total of 22 observational studies were included in the systematic review, all of which were of moderate or high methodological quality. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that several factors were significantly associated with an elevated risk of venous thrombosis following arthroscopic knee surgery. These factors included age (mean age ≥30 years) [OR = 1.08, 95%CI (1.04, 1.13), P = 0.001], overweight or obesity [OR = 1.31, 95%CI (1.13, 1.52), P<0.001], oral contraceptive use [OR = 1.90, 95%CI (1.52, 2.37), P<0.001], and smoking history [OR = 1.35, 95%CI (1.06, 1.71), P = 0.014]. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis indicated that patients with an average age over 50 years [OR = 3.18, 95%CI (1.17, 8.66), P = 0.001] and those who underwent surgery with a tourniquet for ≥90 min [OR = 4.79, 95%CI (1.55, 14.81), P = 0.007] were at a significantly increased risk of venous thrombosis after knee arthroscopy. Conclusion: Age, obesity, oral contraceptives, smoking history, and prolonged tourniquet use may increase the risk of venous thrombosis after arthroscopic knee surgery. The incidence of venous thrombosis after knee arthroscopy is on a downward trend, but due to its severity, increasing awareness of risk factors and implementing effective prophylaxis are important tasks for clinicians to prevent the risk of venous thrombosis after knee arthroscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0260.008
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.238
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207