MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391730545 · doi:10.1353/esc.2021.a919370

Forgetting All the Way to the End

2021· article· en· W4391730545 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kathryn Walsh Kuitenbrouwer

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForgettingHistoryArtPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forgetting All the Way to the End Kathryn Walsh Kuitenbrouwer (bio) From the Freudian point of view man is the subject captured and tortured by language. Jacques Lacan Seminar III I’ve started this paper three times. Maybe four. I am indeed “captured and tortured by language.” I keep forgetting what I want to write. I forget the words. I forget what the words mean. I forget why I agreed to write this. Forgetting is my problem and I suffer for it. I forget signifiers, especially nouns. I ask my partner if she has noticed that I am forgetting words lately and she says, “I can’t remember.” I stand in the antique store with a lampshade in my hand. I have “lamp-shade” on my list of things I want to buy. I have just read the word on a sign in front of a shelf filled with lampshades. The one I pick has beaded tassels and is silk; it’s probably from the 1920s. The store owner has asked us to write down what we are buying on the bill. I write down, “One large—” and I hold up the lampshade and say, “Whatever this thing is,” and then, [End Page 133] “It sucks getting old,” and the owner shrugs and says, “Tell me about it,” because she can’t recall that this thing is called “lampshade” either. I think that forgetting is its own sort of defense but against what? What could the word lampshade be condensing from my unconscious? It feels like madness, like annihilation, this forgetting. I know that I forget the word for [ ]. And also [ ]. I can see the objects these words describe perfectly so I guess I haven’t lost my mind. It occurs to me that maybe I am released a little from the expectations of the symbolic by these memory lapses. Maybe forgetting loosens the hold the symbolic has on me. I am certainly less afraid of confrontation being a symbolic project than I used to be. This might be the gift of aging. The curse of aging is death, of course, and not my own. Dying is easy compared to losing those you love. I’m mourning this loss of words just when I need them but I am also mourning the critical theorist, Mari Ruti, my friend and mentor, who died of complications due to cancer treatment on 8 June 2023. I’m remembering her even though, like the words I forget, she is gone, and this strange remembering ties me up, locks me down. ________ Mourning: that is when we say goodbye to the lost object. Mourning that introjects that object and refuses to let go tips into melancholia, or so Freud conjectures. ________ It’s Mari who introduces me to theory, and especially Lacanian psychoanalysis. She supervises me through my doctorate and then we write two books together—discourses on how to live and write creatively. I’m not a true-born academic. I am a novelist. My impetus is always to fracture and debilitate language a little and, in so doing, get it to do things it seems not to have been invented to do. But there are academic or academic-adjacent essays to write. These challenge the flights of fancy my mind wants to make. Mari’s precision with academic language stabilizes me. Her grammar is elegant and deliberate. She writes beautiful sentences in English, not her first language. Writing this paper (now my fifth attempt), I am missing her terribly. It’s as if by losing her I lose a grasp on syntax, vocabulary, and how to make meaning. I’m stymied, shut out of myself. I can’t seem to latch on to anything. I write for a few minutes, an hour, and then for the rest of the day, I am exhausted, as if putting words on the page is a physical labour. With this essay, I feel I am dragging grief up a hill. This is terrible for me because words are all I have. I am made of words and for words. [End Page 134] Mari and I are roughly the same age, one year apart. There is no...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207