The Neuroimaging Role of Modified Electroconvulsive Therapy in the Major Depressive Disorder: Effectiveness in First-Episode Antipsychotic-Naive Major Depressive Disorder Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: It is a high risk for adolescents with first-episode major depressive disorder (MDD) to commit suicide. However, few studies reported the effect of modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) in first-episode antipsychotic-naive MDD adolescents. Methods: The study explores the alternations of regional homogeneity of modified electroconvulsive therapy to treat the first-episode antipsychotic-naive major depressive disorder. 72 first-episode MDD patients were recruited from Tianyou Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology from October 2017 to May 2020, and 65 of 72 completed the trial. Results: Before MECT treatment, ReHo values of the bilateral cerebellum and left cuneus were higher, and ReHo value of left postcentral and supramarginal gyrus was lower in MDD patients compared to healthy subjects (HS). After treatment, the MDD patients have higher ReHo values of the right insula and postcentral gyrus, while left fusiform gyrus were lower than the pretreatment. Compared to the HS, the ReHo values of left lingual gyrus, right calcarine cortex, and right mid occipital thalamus were higher in the posttreatment. In the posttreatment, left calcarine cortex and right cerebrum were lower than in healthy subjects. Conclusions: The study confirmed that MECT improves psychotic symptoms in patients with first-episode antipsychotic-naive MDD. These results further contributed to a more tailored treatment approach to MDD from the pathophysiological and neuroimaging views.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".