Heterotroph removal alters the difference in plant biomass among plant species compositions in systems with different N availability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the effects of heterotroph removal on the relationship between species composition and plant biomass in systems with different N availability. Two understory herb species (Ophiopogon bodinieri and Lophatherum gracile) were grown in monocultures and mixture, and heterotroph removal treatments (control, insecticide, fungicide, and fungicide-insecticide combination) were performed on each plant species composition in systems without or with N addition. Results showed that (1) in systems without N addition, the plant biomass of O. bodinieri monoculture was higher than that of the mixture under insecticide and fungicide-insecticide treatments, but this difference disappeared in systems with N addition. (2) In systems without N addition, fungicide and insecticide application increased leaf area but decreased root length and root tips of O. bodinieri monocultures. In systems with N addition, fungicide and insecticide application increased root tips of O. bodinieri monocultures and root diameter of mixtures. (3) In systems without N addition, fungicide and insecticide application increased the soil pH of O. bodinieri monocultures. In systems with N addition, fungicide application decreased the soil K concentration of O. bodinieri monocultures. Our findings suggest that heterotroph removal alters the difference in plant biomass among plant species compositions in systems with different N availability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".