Vegetative Multiplication Of Psidium Guajava L. Through Stem Cutting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The experiment demonstrated the scope of vegetative multiplication of Psidium guajava L. through stem cutting accrued from three year age plants. Cuttings have been treated with five concentration of auxins viz., control (0%), 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6% and 0.8% of IBA (Indole-3-butyric acid) solution and rooted within the shade house. Rooted cuttings have been allowed to grow inside the black polybags with 3:1 ratio of soil and farm yard manure respectively for four months to see the surviving capability and initial rooting performance. The experiment showed that the mature stem cutting may be used to propagate the species. The highest root development (80.67%) was recorded within the cuttings treated with 0.6% IBA followed by using 0.8% IBA solution and the lowest in controlled treatment. The highest number root (36.6) was observed in the cuttings treated with 0.8% IBA solution followed by 0.6% IBA and the lowest in the cuttings without IBA treatment (controlled). The maximum survival percentage (74.33%) was recorded in the cuttings treated with 0.6% IBA solution and the minimum (32.33%) was recorded in the control treatment. There was considerable variation in rooting as well as growth of cuttings due to IBA treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".