Prediction of 4D stress field evolution around additive manufacturing-induced porosity through progressive deep-learning frameworks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the application of machine learning models to predict time-evolving stress fields in complex three-dimensional structures trained with full-scale finite element simulation data. Two novel architectures, the multi-decoder CNN (MUDE-CNN) and the multiple encoder–decoder model with transfer learning (MTED-TL), were introduced to address the challenge of predicting the progressive and spatial evolutional of stress distributions around defects. The MUDE-CNN leveraged a shared encoder for simultaneous feature extraction and employed multiple decoders for distinct time frame predictions, while MTED-TL progressively transferred knowledge from one encoder–decoder block to another, thereby enhancing prediction accuracy through transfer learning. These models were evaluated to assess their accuracy, with a particular focus on predicting temporal stress fields around an additive manufacturing (AM)-induced isolated pore, as understanding such defects is crucial for assessing mechanical properties and structural integrity in materials and components fabricated via AM. The temporal model evaluation demonstrated MTED-TL’s consistent superiority over MUDE-CNN, owing to transfer learning’s advantageous initialization of weights and smooth loss curves. Furthermore, an autoregressive training framework was introduced to improve temporal predictions, consistently outperforming both MUDE-CNN and MTED-TL. By accurately predicting temporal stress fields around AM-induced defects, these models can enable real-time monitoring and proactive defect mitigation during the fabrication process. This capability ensures enhanced component quality and enhances the overall reliability of additively manufactured parts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".