MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391772470 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3930202/v1

Associations between the Choroid Plexus and Tau in Alzheimer’s Disease using an Active Learning Segmentation Pipeline

2024· preprint· en· W4391772470 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jiaxin Li, Yueqin Hu, Yunzhi Xu, Xue Feng, Craig H. Meyer, Weiying Dai, Li Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiGenentechIXICONational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationBioClinicaU.S. Department of DefenseMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyBiogenAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsChoroid plexusPipeline (software)SegmentationNeuroscienceDiseaseMedicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyPathologyCentral nervous systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), primarily generated by the choroid plexus (ChP), is the major carrier of the glymphatic system. The alternations of CSF production and the ChP can be associated with the Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present work investigated the roles of the ChP in the AD based on a proposed ChP image segmentation pipeline. Methods A human-in-the-loop ChP image segmentation pipeline was implemented with intermediate and active learning datasets. The performance of the proposed pipeline was evaluated on manual contours by five radiologists, compared to the FreeSurfer and FastSurfer toolboxes. The ChP volume and blood flow were investigated among AD groups. The correlations between the ChP volume and AD CSF biomarkers including p-tau, t-tau, Aβ42, and Aβ40 was investigated using three models (univariate, multiple variables, and stepwise regression) on two datasets with 806 and 320 subjects. Results The proposed ChP segmentation pipeline achieved superior accuracy with 27.8% and 24.9% higher Dice coefficient compared to the FreeSurfer and FastSurfer. Significantly larger volumes ( p < 0.001) and higher perfusion ( p = 0.032) at the ChP were found in AD compared to CN groups. Significant correlations were found between the tau and the relative ChP volume (the ChP volume and ChP/parenchyma ratio) in each patient groups and in the univariate regression analysis ( p < 0.001), the multiple regression model (p < 0.05 except for the t-tau in the LMCI), and in the step-wise regression model (p < 0.021). In addition, the correlation coefficients reduced from − 0.32 to -0.21 along with the AD progression in the multiple regression model. In contrast, the Aβ42 and Aβ40 shows consistent and significant associations with the lateral ventricle related measures in the step-wise regression model (p < 0.027). Conclusions The proposed pipeline provided accurate ChP segmentation which revealed the associations between the ChP and tau level in the AD. The proposed pipeline is available on github://xxxx.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207