MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391772477 · doi:10.37724/rsu.2023.81.4.005

Experience of using printed materials in British political struggle during election campaigns in the last quarter of the 19th and early 20th centuries

2023· article· ru· W4391772477 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Е.О. Науменкова

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Рязанского государственного университета имени С А Есенина · 2023
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)PoliticsHistoryEconomic historyAncient historyPolitical scienceArchaeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В данной статье рассматривается опыт и практическое использование периодической литературы, полиграфической продукции и других видов политических материалов во время избирательных кампаний в местные и центральные органы власти в конце XIX — начале XX веков в Великобритании. Поднимаются спорные в историографии вопросы, связанные со временем начала широкого использования печатной продукции в крупномасштабной политической агитации. Проанализировано разнообразие источников, из которых материалы поступали в округа, а также информационный материал, изданный на местах. Исследован способ взаимодействия местных и национальных сфер в этом ключевом аспекте предвыборной битвы. Рассмотрено, как различные виды предвыборной литературы вводились в действие и использовались в предвыборных кампаниях в интересах привлечения электората различными политическими силами. Оценивается роль партийных агентов в выпуске прессы. Данный опыт интересен тем, что был принят на вооружение многими европейскими государствами, а сложившиеся тенденции во многом соответствуют реалиям сегодняшнего дня. The article examines the experience and practical use of periodical literature, printed products and other types of political materials during election campaigns for local and central authorities in the late 19thand early 20th centuries in Great Britain. It raises issues that remain controversial in historiography, related to the beginning of broad use of printed materials in large-scale political propaganda. We analyze the variety of sources bringing such materials from the capital, as well as information materials published locally. The paper also discusses the ways in which local and national campaigners interacted in this key arena of the electoral battle. It is examined how various types of campaign materials were introduced and used by various political forces, to attract more voters. We assess the role of party agents in press releases. This experience is relevant because it was later adopted by many European states, and the prevailing trends largely correspond to the realities of today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВестник Рязанского государственного университета имени С А ЕсенинаSame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207