MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391773940 · doi:10.1136/thorax-2023-220333

Do pulmonary rehabilitation programmes improve outcomes in patients with COPD posthospital discharge for exacerbation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4391773940 on OpenAlexaff
Alex R. Jenkins, Chris Burtin, Pat G. Camp, Peter K. Lindenauer, Brian Carlin, Jennifer Alison, Carolyn L. Rochester, Anne E. Holland

Bibliographic record

VenueThorax · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
FundersAmerican Thoracic Society
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary rehabilitationCOPDMeta-analysisRehabilitationExacerbationIntensive care medicineCopd exacerbationSystematic reviewPhysical therapyMEDLINEInternal medicineAcute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Previous systematic reviews have provided heterogeneous and differing estimates for the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this review was to examine the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes initiated within 3 weeks of hospital discharge following an exacerbation of COPD. Methods An update of a previous Cochrane review was undertaken using the Cochrane Airways Review Group Specialised Register. Searches were conducted from October 2015 to August 2023 for studies that initiated pulmonary rehabilitation within 3 weeks of hospital discharge. Studies assessing the impact of solely inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation were excluded. Forest plots were generated using a generic inverse variance random effects method. Results Seventeen studies were included. Posthospital discharge pulmonary rehabilitation reduced hospital re-admissions (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.77, I 2 =67%), improved exercise capacity (6 min walk test, mean difference (MD) 57 m, 95% CI 29 to 86, I 2 =89%; incremental shuttle walk test, MD 43 m, 95% CI 6 to 79, I 2 =81%), health-related quality of life (St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, MD −8.7 points, 95% CI −12.5 to −4.9, I 2 =59%; Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ)-emotion, MD 1.0 points, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.6, I 2 =74%; CRQ-fatigue, MD 0.9 points, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.6, I 2 =91%), and dyspnoea (CRQ-dyspnoea, MD 1.0 points, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.7, I 2 =87%; modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale, MD −0.3 points, 95% CI −0.5 to −0.1, I 2 =60%). Significant effects were not observed for CRQ-mastery, COPD assessment test, EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level and mortality. No intervention-related adverse events were reported. Discussion Pulmonary rehabilitation delivered posthospital discharge for exacerbation of COPD results in a reduction in hospital re-admissions and improvements in exercise capacity, health-related quality of life and dyspnoea in the absence of any intervention-related adverse events. Trial registration number CRD42023406397.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThoraxSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207