MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391782465 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2024.21

Inertial enhancement of the polymer diffusive instability

2024· article· en· W4391782465 on OpenAlexaff
Miles M. P. Couchman, Miguel Beneitez, Jacob Page, Rich R. Kerswell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsInstabilityInertial frame of referenceMechanicsMaterials sciencePolymerClassical mechanicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beneitez et al. ( Phys. Rev. Fluids , vol. 8, 2023, L101901) have recently discovered a new linear ‘polymer diffusive instability’ (PDI) in inertialess rectilinear viscoelastic shear flow using the finitely extensible nonlinear elastic constitutive model of Peterlin (FENE-P) when polymer stress diffusion is present. Here, we examine the impact of inertia on the PDI for both plane Couette and plane Poiseuille flows under varying Weissenberg number ${W}$ , polymer stress diffusivity $\varepsilon$ , solvent-to-total viscosity ratio $\beta$ and Reynolds number ${Re}$ , considering the FENE-P and simpler Oldroyd-B constitutive relations. Both the prevalence of the instability in parameter space and the associated growth rates are found to significantly increase with ${Re}$ . For instance, as $Re$ increases with $\beta$ fixed, the instability emerges at progressively lower values of $W$ and $\varepsilon$ than in the inertialess limit, and the associated growth rates increase linearly with $Re$ when all other parameters are fixed. For finite $Re$ , it is also demonstrated that the Schmidt number $Sc=1/(\varepsilon Re)$ collapses curves of neutral stability obtained across various $Re$ and $\varepsilon$ . The observed strengthening of PDI with inertia and the fact that stress diffusion is always present in time-stepping algorithms, either implicitly as part of the scheme or explicitly as a stabilizer, implies that the instability is likely operative in computational work using the popular Oldroyd-B and FENE-P constitutive models. The fundamental question now is whether PDI is physical and observable in experiments, or is instead an artifact of the constitutive models that must be suppressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207