MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391785767 · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000006235

Perioperative Changes in Serum Transaminase Levels

2024· article· en· W4391785767 on OpenAlexaff
Fumin Wang, Jingming Lu, Tian Yang, Yaoxing Ren, Francesca Ratti, Hugo P. Marques, Sílvia Silva, Olivier Soubrane, Vincent Lam, George A. Poultsides, Irinel Popescu, Răzvan Grigorie, Sorin Alexandrescu, Guillaume Martel, Aklile Workneh, Alfredo Guglielmi, Tom Hugh, Luca Aldrighetti, Itaru Endo, Yi Lv, Xu‐Feng Zhang, Timothy M. Pawlik

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Surgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeHepatocellular carcinomaInternal medicineAspartate transaminaseGastroenterologyIncidence (geometry)ComplicationAdverse effectAlanine transaminaseLogistic regressionSurgeryCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To define how dynamic changes in pre versus postoperative serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) levels may impact postoperative morbidity after curative-intent resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BACKGROUND: Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion can occur at the time of liver resection and may be associated with adverse outcomes after liver resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for HCC between 2010 and 2020 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Changes in AST and ALT (CAA) on postoperative day 3 versus preoperative values ( ) were calculated using the formula: based on a fusion index through the Euclidean norm, which was examined relative to the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The impact of CAA on CCI was assessed by the restricted cubic spline regression and Random Forest analyses. RESULTS: A total of 759 patients were included in the analytic cohort. Median CAA was 1.7 (range: 0.9-3.25); 431 (56.8%) patients had a CAA <2 215 (28.3%) patients with CAA 2 to 5, and 113 (14.9%) patients had CAA ≥5. The incidence of postoperative complications was 65.0% (n = 493) with a median CCI of 20.9 (interquartile range: 20.9-33.5). Spline regression analysis demonstrated a nonlinear incremental association between CAA and CCI. The optimal cutoff value of CAA was 5, identified by the recursive partitioning technique. After adjusting for other competing risk factors, CAA ≥5 remained strongly associated with the risk of postoperative complications (reference CAA <5, odds ratio: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.05-2.55, P = 0.03). In fact, the use of CAA to predict postoperative complications was very good in both the derivative (area under the curve: 0.88) and external (area under curve: 0.86) cohorts (n = 1137). CONCLUSIONS: CAA was an independent predictor of CCI after liver resection for HCC. The use of routine laboratories, such as AST and ALT, can help identify patients at the highest risk of postoperative complications after HCC resection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.566
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of SurgerySame topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisFrench-language works237,207