MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391807391 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi5501

Nanoparticle-based inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors alleviates osteoarthritis pain and cartilage damage

2024· article· en· W4391807391 on OpenAlexaff
Kaige Ma, Tiep Pham, J Wang, InSug O‐Sullivan, Amy DiCamillo, Shiyu Du, Fackson Mwale, Zeba Farooqui, Gina Votta-Velis, Benjamin Bruce, André J. van Wijnen, Ying Liu, Hee‐Jeong Im

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
KeywordsOsteoarthritisMedicineCartilageVascular endothelial growth factorReceptorInflammationPharmacologyInternal medicinePathologyVEGF receptorsAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by cartilage damage, inflammation, and pain. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) have been associated with OA severity, suggesting that inhibitors targeting these receptors alleviate pain (via VEGFR1) or cartilage degeneration (via VEGFR2). We have developed a nanoparticle-based formulation of pazopanib (Votrient), an FDA-approved anticancer drug that targets both VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 (Nano-PAZII). We demonstrate that a single intraarticular injection of Nano-PAZII can effectively reduce joint pain for a prolonged time without substantial side effects in two different preclinical OA rodent models involving either surgical (upon partial medial meniscectomy) or nonsurgical induction (with monoiodoacetate). The injection of Nano-PAZII blocks VEGFR1 and relieves OA pain by suppressing sensory neuronal ingrowth into the knee synovium and neuronal plasticity in the dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord. Simultaneously, the inhibition of VEGFR2 reduces cartilage degeneration. These findings provide a mechanism-based disease-modifying drug strategy that addresses both pain symptoms and cartilage loss in OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207