MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391811814 · doi:10.3390/jmmp8010040

Negative Thermal Expansion Metamaterials: A Review of Design, Fabrication, and Applications

2024· review· en· W4391811814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamaterialNegative thermal expansionFabricationMaterials scienceNanotechnologyAerospaceThermal expansionStructural materialMechanical engineeringEngineering physicsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most materials conventionally found in nature expand with an increase in temperature. In actual systems and assemblies like precision instruments, this can cause thermal distortions which can be difficult to handle. Materials with a tendency to shrink with an increase in temperature can be used alongside conventional materials to restrict the overall dimensional change of structures. Such structures, also called negative-thermal-expansion materials, could be crucial in applications like electronics, biomedicine, aerospace components, etc., which undergo high changes in temperature. This can be achieved using mechanically engineered materials, also called negative thermal expansion (NTE) mechanical metamaterials. Mechanical metamaterials are mechanically architected materials with novel properties that are rare in naturally occurring materials. NTE metamaterials utilize their artificially engineered architecture to attain the rare property of negative thermal expansion. The emergence of additive manufacturing has enabled the feasible production of their intricate architectures. Industrial processes such as laser powder bed fusion and direct energy deposition, both utilized in metal additive manufacturing, have proven successful in creating complex structures like lattice formations and multimaterial components in the industrial sector, rendering them suitable for manufacturing NTE structures. Nevertheless, this review examines a range of fabrication methods, encompassing both additive and traditional techniques, and explores the diverse materials used in the process. Despite NTE metamaterials being a prominent field of research, a comprehensive review of these architected materials is missing in the literature. This article aims to bridge this gap by providing a state-of-the-art review of these metamaterials, encompassing their design, fabrication, and cutting-edge applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it