Differences in brain aging between sexes in Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is linked to faster brain aging. Male sex is associated with higher prevalence, severe symptoms, and a faster progression rate in PD. There remains a significant gap in understanding the function of sex in the process of brain aging in PD. The structural T1-weighted MRI-driven brain-predicted age difference (i.e., Brain-PAD: the actual age subtracted from the brain-predicted age) was computed in a group of 373 people with PD (mean age ± SD: 61.37 ± 9.81, age range: 33-85, 34% female) from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative database using a robust brain-age estimation framework that was trained on 949 healthy subjects. Linear regression models were used to investigate the association between Brain-PAD and clinical variables in PD, stratified by sex. Males with Parkinson's disease (PD-M) exhibited a significantly higher mean Brain-PAD than their female counterparts (PD-F) (t(256) = 2.50, p = 0.012). In the propensity score-matched PD-M group (PD-M*), Brain-PAD was found to be associated with a decline in general cognition, a worse degree of sleep behavior disorder, reduced visuospatial acuity, and caudate atrophy. Conversely, no significant links were observed between these factors and Brain-PAD in the PD-F group. Having 'older' looking brains in PD-M than PD-F supports the idea that sex plays a vital function in PD, such that the PD mechanism may be different in males and females. This study has the potential to broaden our understanding of dissimilarities in brain aging between sexes in the context of PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".