MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Construction and Application of a Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Differentiation Model for Dysmenorrhea Based on Machine Learning

2024· article· en· W4391820441 on OpenAlex
Limin Zhang, Jianing You, Yiqing Huang, Ruiqi Jing, Yifei He, Yujie Wen, Lulu Zheng, Yong Zhao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCombinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shanxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMachine learningArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineRandom forestComputer scienceTraditional Chinese medicinePython (programming language)Logistic regressionClassifier (UML)Data miningMedicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Dysmenorrhea is one of the most common ailments affecting young and middle-aged women, significantly impacting their quality of life. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) offers unique advantages in treating dysmenorrhea. However, an accurate diagnosis is essential to ensure correct treatment. This research integrates the age-old wisdom of TCM with modern Machine Learning (ML) techniques to enhance the precision and efficiency of dysmenorrhea syndrome differentiation, a pivotal process in TCM diagnostics and treatment planning. METHODS: A total of 853 effective cases of dysmenorrhea were retrieved from the CNKI database, including patients' syndrome types, symptoms, and features, to establish the TCM information database of dysmenorrhea. Subsequently, 42 critical features were isolated from a potential set of 86 using a selection procedure augmented by Python's Scikit-Learn Library. Various machine learning models were employed, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest Classifier, Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), each chosen for their potential to unearth complex patterns within the data. RESULTS: Based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics, SVM emerged as the most effective model, showcasing an impressive precision of 98.29% and an accuracy of 98.24%. This model's analytical prowess not only highlighted the critical features pivotal to the syndrome differentiation process but also stands to significantly aid clinicians in formulating personalized treatment strategies by pinpointing nuanced symptoms with high precision. CONCLUSION: The study paves the way for a synergistic approach in TCM diagnostics, merging ancient wisdom with computational acuity, potentially innovating the diagnosis and treatment mode of TCM. Despite the promising outcomes, further research is needed to validate these models in real-world settings and extend this approach to other diseases addressed by TCM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it