MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391823997 · doi:10.3390/ijms25042293

CD163-Mediated Small-Vessel Injury in Alzheimer’s Disease: An Exploration from Neuroimaging to Transcriptomics

2024· article· en· W4391823997 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yuewei Chen, Peiwen Lu, Shengju Wu, Jie Yang, Wanwan Liu, Zhijun Zhang, Qun Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SServierAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEisaiGenentechIXICONorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerBiogenBioClinicaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaEli Lilly and CompanyU.S. Department of DefenseMeso Scale DiagnosticsScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationBristol-Myers SquibbF. Hoffmann-La RocheAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsMechanism (biology)HyperintensityNeuroimagingGeneDiseasePhenotypeTranscriptomeLogistic regressionDiffuse axonal injuryNeurosciencePsychologyMedicineComputational biologyBiologyPathologyInternal medicineTraumatic brain injuryGeneticsMagnetic resonance imagingPsychiatryGene expressionRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) often present with imaging features indicative of small-vessel injury, among which, white-matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are the most prevalent. However, the underlying mechanism of the association between AD and small-vessel injury is still obscure. The aim of this study is to investigate the mechanism of small-vessel injury in AD. Differential gene expression analyses were conducted to identify the genes related to WMHs separately in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitively normal (CN) subjects from the ADNI database. The WMH-related genes identified in patients with MCI were considered to be associated with small-vessel injury in early AD. Functional enrichment analyses and a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network were performed to explore the pathway and hub genes related to the mechanism of small-vessel injury in MCI. Subsequently, the Boruta algorithm and support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithm were performed to identify feature-selection genes. Finally, the mechanism of small-vessel injury was analyzed in MCI from the immunological perspectives; the relationship of feature-selection genes with various immune cells and neuroimaging indices were also explored. Furthermore, 5×FAD mice were used to demonstrate the genes related to small-vessel injury. The results of the logistic regression analyses suggested that WMHs significantly contributed to MCI, the early stage of AD. A total of 276 genes were determined as WMH-related genes in patients with MCI, while 203 WMH-related genes were obtained in CN patients. Among them, only 15 genes overlapped and were thus identified as the crosstalk genes. By employing the Boruta and SVM-RFE algorithms, CD163, ALDH3B1, MIR22HG, DTX2, FOLR2, ALDH2, and ZNF23 were recognized as the feature-selection genes linked to small-vessel injury in MCI. After considering the results from the PPI network, CD163 was finally determined as the critical WMH-related gene in MCI. The expression of CD163 was correlated with fractional anisotropy (FA) values in regions that are vulnerable to small-vessel injury in AD. The immunostaining and RT-qPCR results from the verifying experiments demonstrated that the indicators of small-vessel injury presented in the cortical tissue of 5×FAD mice and related to the upregulation of CD163 expression. CD163 may be the most pivotal candidates related to small-vessel injury in early AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207