Bilateral non-arteritic posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy following COVID-19 vaccination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a case of bilateral posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy, which followed vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 for COVID-19 prophylaxis. A man in his early 60s was initially assessed for bilateral acute vision loss following 3 days of frontal headaches. The patient denied any other preceding visual concerns or symptoms of giant cell arteritis. The patient received his first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination 10 days before the onset of his symptoms.At initial presentation, visual acuity was counting fingers bilaterally. Blood work found normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (6 mm/hour) and C reactive protein (<5 mg/L) as well as a negative infectious and autoimmune serology. He was negative for COVID-19 with PCR testing. Diffusion-weighted MRI showed restricted diffusion along both optic nerves. After 5 months, the patient's visual acuity remained counting fingers bilaterally with pale optic nerves. Isolated bilateral posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy has not been reported in association with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".