Acyclovir dosing in herpes encephalitis: A scoping review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Herpes encephalitis, a rare yet potentially fatal viral infection, is treated exclusively with acyclovir, the sole antiviral medication used for this condition. Acyclovir recommended dose is 10 mg/kg/dose intravenous every 8 hours; however, it is unclear what body weight should be utilized in obese patients. Using the ideal body weight may result in subtherapeutic ineffective concentrations, while utilizing the actual body weight might result in acyclovir induced adverse effects, either nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity or both. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to explore existing evidence regarding acyclovir dosing for obese patients afflicted with herpes encephalitis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases were searched on 26 May 2023, with no language restrictions. Two independent reviewers utilized the Covidence software to carry out the screening and selection of the articles. A total of 22 articles were included in the current review. RESULTS: The prevalence of acyclovir-associated nephrotoxicity ranged from 13% to 21%, while the prevalence of neurotoxicity was not clearly defined. However, there is lack of evidence regarding what may arise from subtherapeutic concentrations. An approach has been suggested to help clinicians to give the most appropriate acyclovir dose to herpes encephalitis patients. Patients with normal kidney function could receive the normal doses based on actual weight if normal weight and based on adjusted body weight if obese. On the other hand, if the patients are experiencing augmented renal clearance, they could receive up to the maximum recommended doses. CONCLUSION: Overall, there is a lack of consistency on which body weight to use to calculate acyclovir dose in obese patients. So it is recommended that further studies compare the concentration of intravenous acyclovir between obese and nonobese patients and relating the resultant concentration with patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".